The Will to Power

Book Two: A Criticism of the Highest Values That Have Prevailed Hitherto
II: Criticism of Morality

§283   The hatred directed against the privileged in body and spirit: the revolt of the ugly and bungled souls against the beautiful, the proud and the cheerful. The weapons used: contempt of beauty, of pride, of happiness: “There is no such thing as merit”, “The danger is enormous: it is right that one should tremble and feel ill at ease”, Naturalness is evil; it is right to oppose all that is natural, even “reason” (all that is anti-natural is elevated to the highest place).

It is again the priests who exploit this condition and who win the “people” over to themselves. “The sinner” over whom there is more joy in heaven than over “the just person”. This is the struggle against “paganism” (the pang of conscience, a measure for disturbing the harmony of the soul). The hatred of the mediocre for the exceptions and of the herd for its independent members. (Custom actually regarded as “morality”).

The revulsion of feeling against “egotism”: that only is worth anything which is done “for another”. “We are all equal” versus the love of dominion, against “dominion” in general; against privilege; against sectarians, free-spirits and sceptics; against philosophy (a force opposing mechanical and automatic instincts); in philosophers themselves “the categorical imperative”, the essential nature of morality, “general and universal”.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

The Will to Power

Book Two: A Criticism of the Highest Values That Have Prevailed Hitherto
II: Criticism of Morality

§282   The weakness of the herd animal gives rise to a morality which is precisely similar to that resulting from the weakness of the decadent man: they understand each other; they associate with each other (the great decadent religions always rely upon the support of the herd). The herd animal, as such, is free from all morbid characteristics, it is in itself an invaluable creature; but it is incapable of taking any initiative; it must have a “leader” — the priests understand this. The state is not subtle, not secret enough; the art of “directing consciences” escapes its grasp. How is the herd animal infected with illness by the priest?

Posted in General | Leave a comment

When morons turn on each other

I suppose it’s no more than unseemly schadenfreude, but I love the sight of morons knifing each other.

In 70 A.D., following the failure of the Jewish Rebellion, the losers started pointing fingers at each other. The loudest was the faction that said God had allowed Rome to triumph because He was mad at the Jews for indulging the Christian sect; the followers of Jesus were thrown out of the Temple, and they soon turned-on their former co-religionists and invented modern anti-semitism.

In 1979, alarmed that many theologians in their very own seminaries were rumored to sometimes speak charitably about Charles Darwin, Paige Patterson et. al. launched a civil war within the Southern Baptist Convention whose after-effects are still felt, and which led to the ruin of countless careers. The fundamentalist takeover of the denomination did slow its decline for a while — but the decline has continued, and lately speeded up, and its most public face, Albert Mohler, is a figure of widespread ridicule.

Now yet another pack of idiots — this time the Nazarenes — are similarly determined to arrest the infiltration of knowledge to their student’s brains.

Evangelicals have just voted another intellectual off their island.

On the eve of April Fools’ Day, while on vacation in Hawaii with his wife, Professor Tom Oord got an email from the president of Northwest Nazarene University (NNU) notifying him that he was being terminated. NNU is one of eight schools sponsored by the evangelical denomination Church of the Nazarene.

Oord was a tenured full professor—the highest rank in academia—who had been on the NNU faculty for 13 years, after several years as my colleague at Eastern Nazarene College. Oord was the university’s leading scholar, with 20 books on his CV; by most measures he was also the denomination’s leading scholar and one of a tiny number of Nazarene theologians whose reputations reached beyond evangelicalism. Oord had won multiple teaching awards and was wildly popular with students and respected by his colleagues. He had brought over a million dollars of grant money to the university—a remarkable accomplishment for a professor at a small, unsung liberal arts college.

Oord’s offense, y’all should understand, is grievous indeed: He is a supporter of evolution.

An entire college could be staffed with the victims of fundamentalist witchhunts in the Church of the Nazarene. And, if we add the victims of witchhunts in other evangelical traditions, we could staff a major research university.

The controversy at NNU is one battle in the long war that is being waged -— and slowly won -— against thinking evangelical Christians.

Yeah, well — ho-hum. It’s not as if this couldn’t be foreseen. The incontestable certainty that there was no Adam and Eve is fatal to the Christian narrative, and so it was inevitable that conflict would break-out between the diehards and those who want to somehow accommodate Christianity to, you know … reality.

The decline and eventual failure of most Christian denominations is inevitable, for the simple reason that the underlying narrative is false; there is no educated, intellectually serious dispute about that. The thing to worry about is the resulting concentration of embittered loonies, for history tells us not only that attempts to arrest the progress of knowledge invariably fail, it tells us also that those who get left behind tend toward violence.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Be true to your cult, ctd

Ask any journalist, lawyer, police officer, doctor or social worker with firsthand knowledge of the problem, and they will all tell you the exact same thing: When a congregation learns that Pastor Bubba is raping their children, they almost invariably1 rally to the pastor and re-victimize the victims. So this story from New Jersey is more depressing than surprising.

“We love our pastor,” Alexander said. “They can say what they want. And I hope I get on YouTube, and I tell you this here. I love my pastor. I love God first, but I love my pastor, and I trust him. And I know that I know him, deep from part of my heart. In the pit of my heart, I know we’re going to be exonerated. When our time comes, you will know.”

“Think what you want,” he added. “We’re going to trust God. We’ve got to answer to nobody but God.”

Alexander said Simmons had a “Godly heart” because he was praying for the woman who accused him of sex crimes.

– – – – –
1   There are occasional exceptions, but they are so rare as, practically, to be unknown.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Mohler on marriage

The prospect of a Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage is so distressing to the Southern Baptists that they are forgetting themselves and speaking frankly.

The biblical view of marriage is clear in the order of the natural world, Mohler said, since even societies outside the Judeo-Christian tradition have understood marriage is for procreation and should be an honored part of civilization.

“We didn’t come up with that in the 1950s,” he said. “I would argue we didn’t come up with that in Western civilization at all, that it was actually written in nature by the creator who made it.”

When you add that to Mohler’s objections to the use of contraception, and his insistence that good, decent, godly people are always prepared to betray their family and friends on command — like Abraham — you have the picture: Marriage is a cosmic license for sexual intercourse, in order to produce li’l Baptists — and that’s all.

You have, too, the reason that family and social pathologies are so acute throughout the Southern Baptist south.

Posted in General | Leave a comment