Clinton’s e-mail scandal: Ignorant, not sinister

This lengthy review of the FBI form-302 interview records upholds what I’ve believed all along about the Clinton e-mail scandal: It has more to do with generational discomfort with e-mail and Internet technology than sinister self-serving.

The interviews—taken together and reconstructed for this article into the first-ever comprehensive narrative of how her email server scandal unfolded—draw a picture of the controversy quite different from what either side has made it out to be. Together, the documents, technically known as Form 302s, depict less a sinister and carefully calculated effort to avoid transparency than a busy and uninterested executive who shows little comfort with even the basics of technology, working with a small, harried inner circle of aides inside a bureaucracy where the IT and classification systems haven’t caught up with how business is conducted in the digital age. Reading the FBI’s interviews, Clinton’s team hardly seems organized enough to mount any sort of sinister cover-up. There’s scant oversight of the way Clinton communicated, and little thought given to how her files might be preserved for posterity — MacBook laptops with outdated archives are FedExed across the country, cutting-edge iPads are discarded quickly and BlackBerry devices are rejected for being “too heavy” as staff scrambled to cater to Clinton’s whims.

There is much to not like here, but they were errors of ignorance rather than deviousness — and are unlikely to be repeated.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.