Today marks the beginning …

… of Banned Books Week, the American Library Association’s annual reminder of the importance of books and the points of view inside them — and the relentless efforts by vested interests to shut down the transmission of ideas via books.

Though much of the effort to ban books originates in religion, for the simple reason that religious claims invariably, necessarily, fail when they fall under the scrutiny of reason, it would be misguided to say that the efforts to ban books always originate in religion. The effort to ban John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath, for instance, originated with California’s growers. Steinbeck loved telling the story till the day he died that, when the growers decided to hold a public burning of his book, they had to mail order a copy before they could carry it out because there were no copies to be had in California.

Think about that and savor the irony, marvel at the ignorance — and bridle at the presumption of those who would control your mind.

If Donald Trump wins the presidency, thus energizing our neo-brown shirts, the ideals of the liberal democracies will confront challenges not seen in centuries. Right now, this day, is a good time to unapologetically carry a (once-)banned book.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

‘Family Values’ wins: Cruz embraces Trump

I speculated a few months back that maybe Ted Cruz isn’t an empty, self-absorbed sewage-being after all.

Ted Cruz explains his decision not to endorse The Donald.

A day after being booed off the Republican National Convention stage, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz stubbornly defended his refusal to endorse Donald Trump, insisting he is not a “servile puppy dog” who would back anyone who personally attacks his family.

The blatant sign of GOP disunity angered some GOP delegates …

Well.

The question is, Is Cruz sincere? If he is, then I find myself unexpectedly wanting to applaud him. Family should stick together …

Well, what do you know? Christian ‘family values’ have prevailed: Ted Cruz has stuck a knife in his father’s back and endorsed the man who accused his father of complicity in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Ted Cruz endorsed Donald Trump for the presidency Friday afternoon, a stunning turn of events after a contentious primary filled with nasty personal attacks and a dramatic snub at the Republican National Convention.

Don’t forget this. Don’t forget George P. Bush endorsing Trump after cataracts of insults directed at Jeb and Columba Bush. Don’t forget the serial lies. And next time you read some ‘think piece’ puzzling over evangelicals’ support of Trump, you’ll know what the explanation is: Donald Trump is the truth about Christianity, and what a Christian Nation will look like.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

My kind of myth

Paul Bunyan, unpretentious plaid, a blue ox whose hooves are so large that they gouged-out the Great Lakes … what’s not to like? And there is absolutely no record anywhere that Bunyan ever urged the death of anybody.

My kind of superhero myth.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Bizarre theology-related tweet of the day

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Revisiting Noah’s Ark

Well, what do you know? Just yesterday I pointed toward Ark Encounter as some gaudy nonsense that would almost certainly persuade any thinking adult who has spent time in the real world that the story is fantastic nonsense … and here comes Albert the Pious to defend it.

The story of Noah’s Ark, and more importantly of the salvation of Noah and his family by a sovereign God and the reality of God’s judgment in a universal flood that destroyed the rest of humanity, that’s actually a very important part of salvation history. In that light, gospel minded Christians should be thankful for anything that serves as a catalyst for that kind of gospel conversation in the telling of the full gospel story, a story that, as we should note, can’t be told without Noah and the ark. But we do have to sit back and wonder when we read the subhead on this story, “Beliefs aside, pricey replica in Kentucky is something to see.” Something to see, beliefs aside? For the life of me, I can’t understand a secular worldview that could understand what’s at stake in terms of the story of Noah and whether believing it or not, merely say, “Beliefs aside, it’s still an amazing thing to see.”

Well, geez — I know exactly what the travel writer meant: “The story is crazy, and you’ve got to be out of your mind to believe it, but that’s a big goddam boat that creaky old man and his boys are supposed have built.”

Do fundies like Mohler have some sort of cognition problem, maybe?

Posted in General | Leave a comment