Leaving church

For some reason the latest PEW study, which finds that Christianity is in steady and accelerating decline, has provoked more than ordinary commentary this year. The latest comes from the Washington Post. The discussion does not even attempt to mount a defense of Christian belief, but bemoans the loss of ‘community.’

Here’s what really worries me: Few of these activities are as geared toward building deep relationships and communal support as the religious traditions the millennials are leaving behind. Actively participating in a congregation means embedding oneself in a community. This involves you in the lives of others and the other way around — their joys and sadnesses, connections and expectations. By leaving religion, we’re shrugging off the ties that bind, not just loosening them temporarily.

W-e-l-l-l … sort of.

As Catholicism shrinks and churches are closed, it’s a commonplace for journalists to visit a closing church and interview elderly congregants cast adrift by the prospect of their church closing. For many people it’s been the center of their life since childhood and, yes, their loss of community is disastrous; many will scarcely go out-of-doors, and only rarely speak to another human being, again.

But there is a distinction to be made between Christianity as a belief and church as a community center; the loss of the former is a good thing, and the latter can be replaced.

From the story of The Fall, to Abraham’s near sacrifice of Isaac, to the story of The Flood, to the promised carnage of The Apocalypse, Christianity sends a single and degrading message: Y’all are no damn good, so shut up and do as you’re told — or else.

Christianity cannot flourish amongst the healthy; it needs sickness and insecurity, and demands self-abasement — and its ongoing decline should be celebrated. As for community, people have been organizing themselves into like-minded groups for millennia, and will doubtless manage to do so in the future without some blustery Holy Man wagging a finger at them.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Tweet for the day

When the Commander-in-Chief gets booed at the ballpark mere hours after announcing a successful mission to rid the world of evil like al-Baghdadi, you know there is a sea change in the public mood underway.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Requiem for a fiction

The New York TimesNicholas Kristof takes up the result of the latest PEW poll, which shows that Christianity continues to decline in the United States.

Perhaps for the first time since the United States was established, a majority of young adults here do not identify as Christian.

Only 49 percent of millennials consider themselves Christian, compared with 84 percent of Americans in their mid-70s or older, according to a new report from the Pew Research Center.

Kristof spreads the blame around, apportioning a large share to “blowhards” like James Dobson, Tony Perkins, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Franklin Graham, et. al.; it’s easy to compile a list of utterly repellent spokespeople for Christian piety that no decent adult wants to be identified with. Since I predicted before Donald Trump was even inaugurated that the Evangelical Right’s support for him would be fatal to their influence, I’m inclined to agree that the continuing failure of Christianity has much to do with its malign behavior.

He overlooks two important factors, though. The first is that the Christian narrative is incontestably false; how, after all, do you even have an educated conversation about whether or not Our Invisible Friend surreptitiously impregnated a pubescent teenage girl in order to make her the mother of … himself? It’s too crazy to even discuss. Second, the only contribution Christianity has made to ethical thought is Original Sin, which is no more than degrading nonsense meant to keep the lowly under control.

Christianity was doomed long before televangelists showed-up to clean-out the pockets of its insecure fools; Dobson et. al. are merely hastening the inevitable.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Seemliness in victory

The world is a better and cleaner place because Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead and, because Donald Trump gave the order to put him down, he deserves our gratitude.

Unhappily, his conduct since the raid has been a dispiriting reminder of how utterly unfit he is for the responsibility and power he wields.

When Osama bin Laden was killed, Barack Obama made a late night announcement that lasted about 2-3 minutes. Donald Trump teased the announcement with a tweet and, 12-hours later, made a 48-minutes long speech that thanked Russia for cooperating before he thanked the brave troops that did the job, and lingered indecently over the last squalid minutes of Baghdadi’s life. What is more, he inflated Baghdadi’s importance; ISIS hasn’t controlled anything that could reasonably be described as a state since before Trump took office.

Trump, an insecure showman rather than a self-assured statesman, has a peculiar knack for not knowing when to leave well-enough alone.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Eternity without dogs?

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain

In heaven, all the interesting people are missing.
Friedrich Nietzsche

I don’t believe in an afterlife but, if I did, there’s no way I’d want to spend it with pious buffoons like Albert Mohler or Robert Jeffress; in fact, I’d take care to make sure that couldn’t happen.

I’d like to spend eternity wherever my dogs have gone.

What do you know? Theologians are debating just now whether or not we are reunited with our pets after death.

Randy Alcorn is missing the point. Animals are a gift to humanity for this life, even as family ties are, prior to the resurrection. No one ought to diminish the value of animal companionship. But think this through for a moment: if the most sacred bond, that of a husband and his wife, which, incidentally, is utilized to speak of Christ and His church, is a temporary feature that is for this world alone according to Jesus (Mark 12:25), it is surely a stretch to think of our pets having some sort of tie to us in the eternal state. If our closest family members, husbands, wives and children, do not have a claim to eternity merely through their temporal tie with us, are we to consider that pets of Christians are “elect animals?” This is a laughable conclusion, should one be as so bold as Alcorn to adopt it.

Notice that this clown seems not to know that theology is a species of make-believe with no more intellectual dignity than alchemy or astrology; that’s why theological disputes can’t ever be settled — there are no facts to appeal to.

Seeing Patton again is a pleasant daydream, though.

Posted in General | Leave a comment