{"id":8572,"date":"2018-07-27T11:51:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-27T15:51:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/?p=8572"},"modified":"2018-07-27T12:16:51","modified_gmt":"2018-07-27T16:16:51","slug":"the-innate-fragility-of-scams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/?p=8572","title":{"rendered":"The innate fragility of scams"},"content":{"rendered":"

Andrew Sullivan makes a remark in today’s column<\/a> that closely parallels a passage from Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Antichrist<\/i> that I was thinking of quoting earlier in a (slightly) different context.<\/p>\n

\n

Con men usually know that a con has a life span<\/span>, and not a long one. At some point, it will collapse because it is, in fact, bullshit<\/span>. By then, the best con men have made the sale \u2014 think of \u201cTrump University\u201d \u2014 and moved on. They also know that keeping the suckers sealed off from other sources of contrary information is essential<\/span> until the deal is done. You have to maintain a fiction relentlessly<\/span>, dismiss or delegitimize external information that might get your marks to think differently, and constantly make the sale. You have to humor and flatter and bullshit all the time, until you\u2019ve sealed the deal.<\/p>\n

And Trump is really, really good at this. In fact, it\u2019s his chief skill, along with his instinct for the easy mark and another human being\u2019s vulnerable spot. It has worked many times before. It\u2019s at the root of his entire shady business career. His problem now, however, is that this is the biggest of all cons, if you\u2019re playing at a presidential level, and is also the longest. It has to be sustainable for at least four years. And that\u2019s an extremely long time to keep it alive.<\/p>\n

This is why, it seems to me, Trump tweets so often and so aggressively. It\u2019s his chief mechanism for keeping his dupes under his spell, for sustaining the narrative of the con<\/span> while reality tugs at it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The corresponding passage in Nietzsche, The Antichrist<\/i>, §9:<\/p>\n

\n

Against this theologians’ instinct I wage war: I have found its traces everywhere. Whoever has theologians’ blood in his veins, sees all things in a distorted and dishonest perspective to begin with<\/span>. The pathos which develops out of this condition calls itself faith: closing one’s eyes to oneself once and for all, lest one suffer the sight of incurable falsehood<\/span>. This faulty perspective on all things is elevated into a morality, a virtue, a holiness; the good conscience is tied to faulty vision; and no other perspective is conceded any further value once one’s own has been made sacrosanct<\/span> with the names of “God,” “redemption,” and “eternity.” I have dug up the theologians’ instinct everywhere: it is the most widespread, really subterranean, form of falsehood found on earth.<\/p>\n

Whatever a theologian feels to be true must be false: this is almost a criterion of truth. His most basic instinct of self-preservation forbids him to respect reality at any point or even to let it get a word in<\/span>. Wherever the theologians’ instinct extends, value judgments have been stood on their heads and the concepts of “true” and “false” are of necessity reversed: whatever is most harmful to life is called “true”; whatever elevates it, enhances, affirms, justifies it, and makes it triumphant, is called “false.” When theologians reach out for power through the “conscience” of princes (or of peoples), we need never doubt what really happens at bottom: the will to the end, the nihilistic will, wants power.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Donald Trump is trapped by the same dilemma that traps preachers, the same dilemma that eventually traps every scammer — a fake reality has to be maintained. Trump attacks the media as “the enemy of the people.” The church used to dispose of them by just burning them at the stake.<\/p>\n

It’s not a coincidence that so many Holy Men have rallied to Trump; he is their brother in the most meaningful sense of the word.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Andrew Sullivan reprises one of Nietzsche’s most important insights today. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8572"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8572"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8572\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8580,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8572\/revisions\/8580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}