{"id":6338,"date":"2017-06-28T16:39:41","date_gmt":"2017-06-28T20:39:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/?p=6338"},"modified":"2017-06-28T21:26:57","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T01:26:57","slug":"the-problem-of-suffering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/?p=6338","title":{"rendered":"The problem of suffering"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/brucegerencser.net\/2017\/06\/quote-day-kind-suffering-problem-bart-ehrman\/\" target=\"_blank\">Bruce Gerencser<\/a> points toward a discussion at Bart Ehrman&#8217;s (paywalled) blog taking-up the problem of suffering.  Ehrman writes &#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I\u2019m not completely sure when I first started realizing that the enormous amount of suffering in the world, so much of it completely gratuitous, is a problem for anyone who believes that there is a loving and powerful God who is in control of what happens.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This points toward what is known  as the &#8220;problem of evil:&#8221; Why does an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good god permit evil (or, suffering)?<\/p>\n<p>Ehrman rightly concludes that the inadequacy of any proposed solution to the problem, or theodicy, ought to bother believers.  For my part, I think that the so-called problem points to the intellectual unseriousness of theology.<\/p>\n<p>Notice: As posed, the question posits three premises &#8212; god is all-knowing (hence, aware of suffering), god is all-powerful (hence, capable of alleviating suffering), all-good (hence, <i>wants<\/i> to relieve suffering).  But there is a fourth, antecedent and unspoken, premise: God exists.  Here, it seems to me, is exactly where the sleight-of-hand comes in.  If you can&#8217;t prove god exists &#8212; and every theologian and Holy Man on earth freely concedes that when they prescribe faith, or belief without evidence &#8212; then how can you make claims about god&#8217;s attributes?  The setup actually looks like this:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p>I can&#8217;t prove My Invisible Friend exists, but he does.<\/p>\n<li>\n<p>I can&#8217;t prove it, but My Invisible Friend knows about suffering.<\/p>\n<li>\n<p>I can&#8217;t prove it, but My Invisible Friend could make suffering go away any time he chose.<\/p>\n<li>\n<p>I can&#8217;t prove it, but My Invisible Friend <i>wants<\/i> suffering to go away.<\/ol>\n<p>And what is the (so-called) problem of evil? This: Why doesn&#8217;t the world look as we&#8217;d expect it to look if those four unproven premises are correct?<\/p>\n<p>Please.  This is not intellectually serious; it&#8217;s nothing but tarted-up make-believe.  It never rises to the level of a <i>bona fide<\/i> problem.<\/p>\n<p>If you look through an engineer&#8217;s files, you will find page after page after page of calculations &#8212; and every single line of those calculations has a pedigree.  You will find right triangles, and the solution of the length of a hypotenuse can be traced all the way back to Pythagoras in ~ 550 BC.  You will find geometry that can be traced back to Euclid&#8217;s <i>Elements<\/i>.  You will find calculus, and Isaac Newton&#8217;s proof of his techniques is in the public domain.  For every equation in physics, electronics, mechanics &#8230; there is a pedigree, a history that names a specific individual who made an observation, explained it, and all those afterward who contested the explanation, refined it, improved it, tested it.<\/p>\n<p>But theologians can&#8217;t even be sure that Jesus ever existed; remember that next time you hear one of them sneer at &#8216;materialism&#8217; and aggrandize themselves as learned men.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bruce Gerencser points toward a discussion at Bart Ehrman&#8217;s (paywalled) blog taking-up the problem of suffering. Ehrman writes &#8230; I\u2019m not completely sure when I first started realizing that the enormous amount of suffering in the world, so much of &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/?p=6338\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6338"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6338"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6346,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6338\/revisions\/6346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bobfelton.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}